uTrack 24 vs. LP-16

Home Page Forums Cymatic Audio Forum uTrack 24 uTrack 24 vs. LP-16

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
  • #106251
    Tim Lawhorn

    Hi and thanks in advance for any help.

    I was recently made aware of the LP-16 as a very good device to use on live stage with pre-recorded backing tracks. I would prefer a rack mounted device though, and was wondering if the uTrack 24 operated the same as the LP-16, but in a rack configuration with more track access. I’m not currently interested in using the uTrack24 for anything more than live performance backing tracks, and possibly adding a foot switch to advance songs. What are the differences between these two units for this specific application?

    Thank you:)

    Jeroen Schlaman

    Well, the main differences with the LP-16 are:
    – Playback 24 instead of 16 tracks
    – Rack mounted
    – Recording 24 tracks
    – Master-slave possibility (two uTracks playing simultaneously
    for redundancy reasons)
    – More interfacing options instead of only analog in/out (AudioLan, MADI, etc.) with option cards.

    For me the rack mount and possibility to use different interfacing was the go for me to take the uTrack instead of LP-16.

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.